• Portability

With the advent of mobile browsing, google has hopped on board with making the most of the current usability options provided with the iPhone, Android, Blackberries, and the like. The ability to access documents held online while I’m away from a computer is brilliant, and the fact that it’s free is a major plus.

• Starfish nature

The actual google search engine doesn’t decide what you will and will not see when you search for something, with the exception of ranking pages based on number of hits, what you type greatly effects what you will get. On the other hand, you have browsers like Yahoo tagging and deciding what sites they’d like to see pop up with keywords. Un-bogged and un-altered search results? Win.

• One stop shop

I’ve already said my piece about google docs, add to that email, website creation, blog creation, a good browser, and that little video place, google is working towards being the central hub of the internet. This combined with the facts that they really don’t alter content, and the users ability to get what they want is very high, makes me think that google is going to be a long standing enterprise. (For more cool apps check here)

• Money

These guys are rich, their IPO was pure insanity, making even their secretaries incredibly rich. With the money gained, they’re now on a buying spree, we’ve seen it with youtube, myspace, and now there are rumors about twitter being on the potential target list. These guy’s have enough money to gobble up every major web 2.0 site that pops up (and what sets them apart is they don’t change the operating style of the bought out sites, they keep what works).

• Fanboyism

One of the reasons I think that Apple is so sucessful is the rampant fanboyism (um… I’m guilty as charged there), and it wasn’t until I started looking deeper into the google world that I realized google fanboyism is a growing trend, complete with www.googlefanboy.com. It’s the fanboy’s ability to proselytize the products of a company creates the sort of grassroots growth potential that major marketing campaigns can’t touch. A story of note here: My parents are probably going to buy macs for their next computers (both have already bought iPhones), without my constant fanboy attitude about apple, I highly doubt that my parents would shell out the extra money for a Mac.

(Right now, I really wish adsense gave me extra rewards for mentioning google.)

Any thoughts?

Technorati Tags: Blog, blogger, google, google chrome, internet, iphone, myspace, technology, web, web 2.0, youtube, facebook, twitter

So, I downloaded a few apps for my iPhone to help me out with school and productivity issues, and I noticed that a couple of them have a large amount of google documents integration. After looking into a bit and noticing that google docs were accessible from my iPhone, I realized that creating all my note sets and study sheets in GDocs would be a big boon to me (downtime at work=pull out iPhone).

After I started looking a google docs, I remembered iGoogle, google’s web based dektop program. After spending a few minutes looking around iGoogle, I found a few “gadgets” that really seem like they’ll benefit me in day to day information access, and in a place that I’ll find myself quite often (homepage for Firefox is now set to iGoogle). With the combined portability of google docs, and the usability of iGoogle, I’m rather impressed with the current setup.

My question, to those of you who are far more integrated into web 2.0 (ahem… blake): What iGoogle “gadgets” should I add into my desktop, and are there any other apps that I need to consider working into usage?

Edit: I have changed my email address, please update it if you keep it in your address book: matt@themattscott.com . I’m trying to have everything non-personal (ie blog stuff and the like) moved over in the next couple weeks.

First, themattscott is now viewable on the iphone in a much easier to deal with format. I’ve forgotten the name of the app that does it, but I’ll find it and update the post later (and break the second rule, no links) from home. If all wordpress blogs could kindly install the addon my day would be that much brighter.

Now the point of the post, blog copy rights. There is a good deal of information sharing that goes on in the blogosphere, and most blogs denote copyrights at the bottom of there pages. That copyright in no way stops another blogger, or an author of a book for that matter, from using said material in their own work, without propperly crediting the source. The current format of “works citing” on a blog is either a hat tip (denoted as HT) or by inserting a link to track back to the original post. These would never pass as acceptable citations in the academic publishing yet academics (scholars, whatever term you wish to insert) seemingly have no qualms about citing materials in this way on there informal blog settings.

My question then: “Is web 2.0 in general, and blogging specifically, beggining to alter our view of copyright and works citation?”

In the USA today article, Frank Page, who had been trying to reform the party during his term, was quoted saying:

“I have admonished — lovingly but firmly — our convention not to get too close to any political party, parties change. I think we need to stay close to issues, and not hold allegiance to political parties.”

Which I must applaud. Actually, the more I read about Page and the changes he *tried* to bring, the more I like the guy. Page himself has even met with Obama, and says he will not blindly hold to either political party. I think that’s great advice that we can all learn from. I do fear that I may fall onto the democratic side of things, if the republic side continues to be resoundly pro-war, but thats a tangent for another post.

Anyways, contrast the above quote with this snippet from the AJC article:

The appointments Hunt will make will define whether he plans to hew the party line or open the leadership up to those outside the traditional circle of power, Key said.

Hunt said, “We went through 12 years of conservative resurgence, which I think was wonderful.

So, I am again concerned with the types of political moves the party will make. One point I forgot to mention yesterday was that Georgia’s Governor is a member (and Sunday School teacher) of Johnny Hunt’s church, which should shed a bit more light on how political they are.

So Blake asked yesterday if I thought that Johnny would “roll back the clock” on things like climate change, and I’ll answer “No” to that. I think that there is too much pressure globally to ignore climate change. Instead, I think that Johnny will increase the SBC’s social justice program, these two paragraphs from the USA Today article clues you in on that:

His church sponsors numerous outreaches into its Cherokee County community beyond the evangelism that has defined Southern Baptists. It has a food pantry, a ministry to burned-out pastors, English classes for immigrants and numerous ways to reach out to young people. In October, the church plans a three-day drive that will include free food and health care for the needy and it will send volunteers in the community to repair homes and clean up public spaces.

Hunt calls the program Loving Loud and wants to inspire the convention with it as well.

So, we’ll watch and wait to see how this all works out. I’m hopeful (about the social aspect), yet just a little bit worried (about the politics like homosexuality, and the right to buy alcohol on Sunday).

I’ll straight up say it, it’s awesome, but… I hate it.

And, I love it.

Why?

The internet has brought great things into my life, without the internet I probably would have never discovered Emergent, without Wikipedia I would have probably shot myself from boredom at my last job (I came away with a ton of pointless information), without the iTunes I would have no where near the same amount of exposure to music that I do. It’s brought great changes in my life, and I know that I wouldn’t want to go back to a stage where I didn’t have access to it. Honestly, I could write an entire blog about how it has impacted my life for good, but where’s the fun in that.

But at the same time I have to acknowledge the problems brought about by its incorporation in my life.  The main one? A lack of relationships.

Think about it.

My personal network of people I’m acquainted with and, even moreso, the number of people I consider friends, is far higher than it would likely be if I didn’t have access to the internet. Web 2.0 applications like Facebook, Myspace, and Xanga (if you want to get old school) enable us to meet people we’d likely never see in our “real” lives. Even through the outlet of blogging I have discovered people I am nearly positive I’d never see in real life. (Andrew Martin for instance, a frequent commenter on this blog, and a great blogger himself).

At the same time my “network” is growing, the depth of these new relationships is about the same of the latest Hannah Montana song.

The same problem is popping up in our personal lives. We now have the ability to carry on friendships that we make in person both over the phone and online. In fact, when my wife and I started dating, we really never saw each other too much, but we talked on the phone for hours (a few times all night- but who hasn’t done that?) and on-line (AIM not iChat, that was the dark ages before I met my first mac). In a sense the internet made interactions between the two of us easier, and was probably the best way for us to interact, considering, that at the time, we were too young to drive and thus couldn’t see each other face to face without the cumbersome act of convincing a parent to drive us. While the internet enabled my wife and I to have a relationship before we could drive to see each other, real depth came through face to face interaction.

Another issue that I’m struggling with surrounding the Internet is conversation. One of the greatest parts about face-to-face conversation is fluidity.  While there are certainly breaks in conversation, topics flow naturally from one to another. Face-to-face conversation also allows for thought to be expressed as it is happening. So when a friend and I are discussing a subject we can both keep the conversation going from issue to issue within a shorter course, and bring up items as they flow free form into our thought processes.

Not so with the Internet. Instead conversations are often disjointed, with breaks in ideas, or multiple people carrying different conversations at the same time on the same forum (Forum meaning chat room, actual forum, blog comment section). Then there’s the problem where conversations are not happening now, they are happening over a long course of time, which is a frustrating experience when you are so enthralled with what you’re discussing.

I feel like I’m getting long winded, but I wanted to get some of this off my chest, as always your thoughts and comments are appreciated.