Why I Am Agnostic

I talked a bit about why I am not a Christian, and a bit about the Christ I see and follow, now I’d like to begin stepping into why I don’t believe in god. I’d like to thank everyone that’s read these posts so far, all the comments I have received have been of good character, which does surprise me a bit. Undoubtedly I’ve ended up on a prayer list or two (if I wasn’t there already), but I’d like to say this, if you don’t agree with me, don’t think I’ll bash you if you tell me so, trust me, I understand I’m in a minority here.

For most of my life I have clung to certainty, often in a vain attempt to feel secure in the world that is, at its core, innately insecure. I grew up certain of black and white, right and wrong, good and evil, absolute truth, because I needed these things. The world needed to be orderly and neat, it needed to work for some grand design and purpose, I needed there to be a God.

The more I’ve grown up, the more I understand the innate disorder in the world. While, at many levels, things follow upon a central chain of causality, but at the same time, I’ve seen things that are far outside of the comprehension of order. I’ve seen both good and ill come outside of order; I’ve read a story about an enlightened individual that sacrificed himself to break the “orderly” understanding of violence. I’ve read other stories of “senseless violence”, in which the perpetrator had no cause to inflict pain,  (BTK killer, anyone?), yet did so.

Then I began to move away from my modern need for absolute truth, and towards a postmodern understanding of truth. I am not implying that postmodernism ultimately leads to an agnostic/atheist understanding, many of my postmodern friends are devout believers in (a) god, I am simply stating that my view of god was influenced by my understanding of truth.  I began to understand the world more in terms of contradiction (which, I likely picked up from my eastern philosophical influences), than absolutes, and saw less and less the need for order.

For quite some time after I began to understand the world in new terms, I held to God. I held to things like the vast number of requirements needed for the world to continue on as reasons for an intelligently designed evolution, and things like the argument of first cause to explain how “it” all got started.  I think, however, at some level I realized I was beginning to make excuses to hold on. I started moving ever more towards simply admitting that there may be a god, but I don’t know, and I won’t state either way conclusively.

I was having dinner with a friend one night, when I finally started voicing the questions I had been playing with in my mind for a while. “What if the world just doesn’t make sense? What if there is no point? Do I need a god to give my life meaning?” In my mind, I was saying no to all these questions. My friend and I had a little back and forth over it, and then I started to dwell on the subject more after that night, until I finally jumped ship a couple weeks ago.

I think I’ll have to expound on this a bit more, it’s a rather broad subject to poke around, and this post is more of a “here’s how I got here” than any sort of defense of my opinion.

As always, the better conversations happen in the comments.

email2friend
  • Who wants not lead a healthier life? Obviously everyone. Most important part of our healthier living is healthy food. I think naturals are always better than other. So, I like to be stick with any type of natural food not only milk. I believe the most important part of our healthier living is healthier food.
  • apmapmapm
    I'm not schooled in philosophy, so may be naive in my comments.

    What I don't understand, and where I think I agree with Blake, is how you invoke a postmodern understanding of truth, but then place yourself within a framework of belief/unbelief, with agnosticisim as a middle path. Those lines of thought seem to belong to different systems, different norms, different expectations. Belief and unbelief seem over-simplistic categories to me.
  • apmapmapm
    Oh, and existence, likewise: it's too simple a notion to take seriously. Do quarks exist?
  • I think I will hold off on more substantial comments too. I'm interested to see what more you have to say.

    Right now, though, I agree with you. I have no interest in "God," if by that we mean some sort of Big Other -- a transcendental signified who is the ultimate guarantor of meaning in the world. I don't think such a "thing" exists. Divinity is not tantamount to being, at least don't think it has to be.

    Yet I am hesitant to call my own position one of agnosticism because, for me, that term seems to imply a sort of modern, laissez faire approach. I am interested in speaking of God and thinking about what that name signifies after the "death" of the modern God mentioned above. For me, that is where it really gets interesting. And that is why I am drawn to continental philosophy of religion and postmodern theology. Because it is much more interesting than the old, tired debates of theism and atheism.
  • I think agnosticism is the best term to explore my viewpoint, but I would hesitate in saying that it was either rooted in modernism, or within the a/theism dichotomies of before. If anything, I view it as the ultimate standpoint of "I don't know, and I'm not comfortable with making truth claims about it."

    Re: continental philo, when I finally start applying to post-grad programs, it will (most likely, but I may change a bit) be for continental, but I'll probably look for those programs that intertwine analytical standpoints with it (this is becoming more a more common practice).
  • D. Foster
    This seems like an introduction to a more detailed series of posts, so I'm just going to hold off on the comments here :)

    I will chime in and say that I would be interested to hear about the process by which you've reached your current position, and what exactly you mean by "Agnosticism." Regardless of how certain we are of our beliefs, I think all people have, at the very least, a provisional, tentative set of convictions that we live by. What are the things that you would say you are pretty certain are true, and why these things?

    And I have one question that I'm guessing you'll probably delve deeper into in later posts. When you say you jumped ship, does that mean you jumped the ship of Theism? Atheism? Agnosticism? That just wasn't really clear to me.
  • I think I had swung myself overboard from the ship of theism about a year ago, but for some reason I got caught up in some trailing lines and was taken for a ride for a while.
blog comments powered by Disqus
ramblings-theology-my thoughts